Openstatus MCP Health Checker
Test MCP servers like a real AI client, not just a ping
About Openstatus MCP Health Checker
Your SOC 2 auditor will ask how you communicate incidents to external parties. If the answer is "we sent a Slack message" or "we emailed a few customers," that's not going to cut it. Openstatus exists to close that gap fast — it's an open-source status page and uptime monitoring tool built specifically so growing teams can prove incident communication without spinning up a custom solution or paying enterprise prices for a legacy vendor.
The pitch is tight: set up status.yourcompany.com, connect your monitors, and you've got a timestamped, auditor-friendly trail of every incident you've ever communicated — in under two minutes. Monitoring runs from 28 regions across three cloud providers, alerts fire to Slack, Discord, PagerDuty, or email the moment something breaks, and your status page updates automatically. No manual work during an outage when you're already stressed.
What makes Openstatus worth a second look for technical teams is the programmatic layer. Every dashboard action is reachable via CLI, a typed HTTP API with an OpenAPI spec, a Terraform provider, or an MCP server — meaning you can let Claude, ChatGPT, or Cursor actually manage your monitoring. It's built by a bootstrapped two-person team (Thibault and Max), it's profitable and self-funded, and it's trusted by teams like Cal.com, Documenso, and WhiteBIT. The free tier requires no credit card, and paid plans start at $30/month.
Key features
28-Region Uptime Monitoring
Openstatus checks your HTTP endpoints — REST or GraphQL — from 28 regions across Europe, North America, South America, Asia, Africa, and Oceania, spanning three cloud providers, so you catch regional outages before your customers do.
Audit-Ready Status Pages
Every status report is automatically timestamped and documented, giving you the incident communication trail that SOC 2's CC2.3 criteria requires, without any manual record-keeping.
MCP Server for AI Agents
Openstatus ships an MCP server so you can let Claude, ChatGPT, or Cursor query and manage your monitors directly — no dashboard required for teams building AI-assisted ops workflows.
Infrastructure-as-Code Support
You can version your monitors as YAML with CI/CD or as HCL via the Terraform provider, treating uptime configuration the same way you treat the rest of your infrastructure.
Multi-Channel Alerting
Alerts route to Slack, Discord, PagerDuty, OpsGenie, Grafana OnCall, WhatsApp, SMS, email, or webhooks — the Pro plan supports up to 20 separate notification channels.
Private Monitoring via Docker
For services behind firewalls or on private networks, Openstatus supports monitoring through a single Docker container, so internal endpoints aren't left out of your uptime coverage.
Best for
- SaaS teams preparing for SOC 2 audits
- Engineering teams who want monitors version-controlled alongside code
- Founders who need a branded status page without enterprise pricing
- Teams building AI-assisted ops workflows using Claude or Cursor
- Open-source projects that want a self-hostable monitoring stack
Skip if
- Skip this if you need sub-30-second check intervals on the free or Starter plan — the minimum on Starter is 1 minute, and 30-second intervals are Pro-only.
- Skip this if you need more than one status page without paying extra — additional pages cost $20/month each on Starter, and the free plan caps you at one page with three components.
- Skip this if you require data retention beyond 3 months on Starter — 12-month retention is a Pro-only feature.
Pros & cons
Pros
- The MCP server integration is genuinely differentiated — very few monitoring tools let Claude or Cursor manage your monitors directly.
- 28-region coverage across three cloud providers on paid plans is solid for a $30/month starting price.
- Open-source and self-hostable, so you're not locked into the SaaS if your requirements change.
- The free tier is genuinely usable for solo projects: one monitor, one status page, no credit card required.
- Annual billing brings Starter down to $25/month and Pro to ~$83/month — meaningful savings for a bootstrapped team.
Cons
- The free plan limits you to 6 regions (not 28), a 10-minute check interval, and just 14 days of data retention — meaningful gaps if you're monitoring anything production-critical.
- White-label branding costs $300/month on top of any plan, which is steep relative to the base plan prices.
- Email authentication and IP restriction for password-protected pages cost an additional $100/month each — access control features that feel like they should be included at Pro.
- The team is two people; that's transparency about sustainability, but it's also a real bus-factor consideration for enterprise buyers.
Pricing
| Tier | Price | Includes |
|---|---|---|
| Free (Hobby) | $0/month | 1 monitor (10-minute interval), 1 status page with 3 components, 6 regions, 14-day data retention, 30 on-demand checks/month, 1 notification channel |
| Starter | $30/month (or $300/year — $25/month) | 20 monitors (1-minute interval), 1 status page with 20 components (+$20/month each additional), 28 regions (6 per monitor), 3-month data retention, 100 on-demand checks/month, 10 notification channels, custom domain, unlimited team members, Slack/Discord/PagerDuty/WhatsApp/SMS alerts |
| Pro | $100/month (or $1,000/year — ~$83/month) | 50 monitors (30-second interval), 5 status pages with 50 components (+$20/month each additional), 28 regions (all 28 per monitor), 12-month data retention, 300 on-demand checks/month, 20 notification channels, private locations, OTel Exporter, audit log, all alert channels |
Frequently asked questions
Does Openstatus satisfy SOC 2 CC2.3 requirements?
SOC 2's CC2.3 requires demonstrating incident communication with external parties, and Openstatus covers this with timestamped status reports, subscriber notifications, and a documented incident history. It doesn't replace a full SOC 2 program, but most teams find it satisfies the auditor's specific ask for incident communication evidence.
How does the MCP server work?
Openstatus ships an MCP server that lets AI tools like Claude, ChatGPT, or Cursor interact with your monitoring setup programmatically — the same actions available in the dashboard are exposed through the MCP interface. It's one of four programmatic access methods alongside the CLI, REST API, and Terraform provider.
How does Openstatus compare to Statuspage by Atlassian?
Atlassian's Statuspage starts at $29/month but doesn't include built-in uptime monitoring — you'd need a separate tool like PagerDuty or Datadog. Openstatus bundles both the status page and monitoring from 28 regions starting at $30/month, and it's open-source so you can self-host it.
Can I monitor services that aren't publicly accessible?
Yes — Openstatus supports private location monitoring via a single Docker container, which lets you monitor endpoints behind firewalls or on internal networks. This feature is available on the Pro plan.
What's included in the free plan?
The free plan includes 1 monitor with a 10-minute check interval, 1 status page with 3 components, 6 monitoring regions, 14 days of data retention, and 30 on-demand checks per month — no credit card required.
How Openstatus MCP Health Checker compares
Openstatus MCP Health Checker vs Statuspage (Atlassian)
Statuspage is the incumbent but doesn't include uptime monitoring — you're paying $29/month for the page alone, then layering on a separate monitoring tool, whereas Openstatus bundles both for $30/month and adds open-source self-hosting as an option.
Openstatus MCP Health Checker vs Better Uptime
Better Uptime has a polished UI and on-call scheduling, but it's closed-source, starts at $24/month for very limited features, and doesn't offer a Terraform provider or MCP server for teams who want infrastructure-as-code or AI-agent access.
Openstatus MCP Health Checker vs UptimeRobot
UptimeRobot is the go-to free monitoring tool, but its status pages are basic, it monitors from far fewer regions than Openstatus's 28, and it won't satisfy a SOC 2 auditor looking for documented incident communication history.
Reviews
No reviews yet — be the first.