
DALL·E 3
OpenAI's text-to-image model.
About DALL·E 3
DALL·E 3 came out of OpenAI's research group, and the credits on openai.com name the people behind it: core research and execution by Gabriel Goh, James Betker, Li Jing and Aditya Ramesh, with dozens more across inference optimization, product, safety and policy. The reason they built it is stated plainly on the launch page: "Modern text-to-image systems have a tendency to ignore words or descriptions, forcing users to learn prompt engineering." The team's goal was a model that sticks to the text you give it, so you don't have to memorize keyword tricks or stack style modifiers to get what you asked for. OpenAI says it makes notable improvements over DALL·E 2 even when given the same prompt.
The most interesting design choice is that DALL·E 3 is built natively on ChatGPT. You don't write the final prompt yourself. You describe what you want, in anything from a single sentence to a full paragraph, and ChatGPT writes a detailed, tailored prompt for the image model. If an image is close but not quite right, you ask for tweaks in a few words and ChatGPT handles the rewrite. It's available to ChatGPT users and to developers through the OpenAI API, which bills on a pay-as-you-go basis.
Here's the honest part: the DALL·E 3 page now describes itself as the post that introduced the model and points you to ChatGPT Images 2.5 for the current experience. So DALL·E 3 is the previous generation inside ChatGPT, and you should know that before you build a workflow around it. What still stands out is the rights policy. OpenAI says the images are yours to reprint, sell or merchandise without asking permission. The guardrails are strict, though: it declines requests that name public figures and requests for the style of a living artist. If you want a conversational image tool with clear commercial terms, it's a sensible pick. If you need celebrity likenesses or artist-style mimicry, it won't do it.
Key features
Prompt adherence
OpenAI built DALL·E 3 to follow the exact text you provide instead of ignoring words, which is the main fix it claims over earlier text-to-image systems.
ChatGPT as prompt writer
Because it's built natively on ChatGPT, you can describe an idea casually and ChatGPT will generate a detailed, tailored prompt for the image model.
Conversational edits
If you like an image but it's not quite right, you can ask ChatGPT for tweaks in a few words rather than rewriting the prompt from scratch.
API access
Developers can call DALL·E 3 through the OpenAI API, so you're not limited to generating images inside the ChatGPT interface.
Commercial usage rights
OpenAI states the images you create are yours to reprint, sell or merchandise without needing its permission.
Creator opt-out
Artists and creators can opt their images out of training for OpenAI's future image generation models through a dedicated opt-out form.
Best for
- people who don't want to learn prompt engineering
- ChatGPT users who want images inside the same chat
- developers adding image generation via the OpenAI API
- small businesses making images they plan to sell or merchandise
Skip if
- Skip this if you want the newest OpenAI image model, since the page itself points you to ChatGPT Images 2.5 for the current experience.
- Skip this if your work involves named public figures, because DALL·E 3 is designed to decline those requests.
- Skip this if you want images in the style of a living artist, as the model refuses that by design.
Pros & cons
Pros
- Strong focus on following your prompt exactly, which OpenAI says beats DALL·E 2 even with the same prompt.
- ChatGPT writes and refines prompts for you, so plain-language requests work fine.
- Clear ownership terms: you can reprint, sell or merchandise what you generate.
- Available in both ChatGPT and the OpenAI API, so you can prototype in chat and ship through code.
- Creators get an opt-out from future model training, which is more than many image tools offer.
Cons
- It's no longer OpenAI's current image experience. The launch page redirects you to ChatGPT Images 2.5.
- Strict refusals on public figures by name and living artists' styles limit some editorial and creative uses.
- The free ChatGPT tier only offers limited image creation, so heavy use pushes you to a paid plan or API billing.
- Source details are thin on technical specs. The page doesn't list resolutions, aspect ratios or API rate limits.
Pricing
| Tier | Price | Includes |
|---|---|---|
| ChatGPT Free | $0/month | Unlimited text chats with GPT-6, limited image creation, limited uploads, voice chats, deep research and memory |
| ChatGPT Go | Monthly subscription | Everything in Free plus more messages with tools and more uploads |
| OpenAI API | Pay-as-you-go | Developer access to DALL·E 3 image generation through the OpenAI API |
Frequently asked questions
Is DALL·E 3 still OpenAI's latest image model?
No. The DALL·E 3 page on openai.com says it introduced the model and directs you to ChatGPT Images 2.5 for the current experience.
How is DALL·E 3 different from DALL·E 2?
OpenAI says DALL·E 3 makes notable improvements over DALL·E 2 even when given the same prompt, mainly by sticking more closely to the words you write. It's also built natively on ChatGPT, which DALL·E 2 wasn't.
Can I sell images I make with DALL·E 3?
Yes. As with DALL·E 2, OpenAI says the images are yours to reprint, sell or merchandise, and you don't need its permission.
How do I pay for DALL·E 3?
Through the OpenAI API it's pay-as-you-go. Inside ChatGPT, the Free plan includes limited image creation and paid plans like Go expand access.
Will DALL·E 3 generate celebrities or copy an artist's style?
No. It's designed to decline requests naming public figures and requests in the style of a living artist, which is stricter than open models like Stable Diffusion.
How DALL·E 3 compares
DALL·E 3 vs Midjourney
Pick Midjourney if you care most about a distinctive aesthetic, and pick DALL·E 3 if you'd rather describe what you want in plain language inside ChatGPT.
DALL·E 3 vs Stable Diffusion
Stable Diffusion's open weights give you local control and fewer content restrictions, while DALL·E 3 trades that flexibility for easier prompting and clear commercial terms.
DALL·E 3 vs Adobe Firefly
Firefly makes more sense if you already live in Adobe's apps, whereas DALL·E 3 fits better if ChatGPT or the OpenAI API is already part of your workflow.
Reviews
Sign in to leave a review.
No reviews yet, be the first.
More like DALL·E 3All image generation tools
Canva Magic Studiocanva.comFree planAI design tools inside Canva.Image GenerationDesign-19.9% search trend, 3 moNo reviews yet
Picsart AIpicsart.comFree planAI image features in Picsart.Image GenerationDesign+14.1% search trend, 3 moNo reviews yet
Civitaicivitai.comFree planOpen AI image model marketplace.Image Generation-14.9% search trend, 3 moNo reviews yet
Bing Image Creatorbing.comFreeMicrosoft's free DALL·E image gen.Image Generation+2.5% search trend, 3 moNo reviews yet
remove.bgremove.bgFree planBackground removal in one click.Image Generation-18.5% search trend, 3 moNo reviews yet
Midjourneymidjourney.comPaidBest-in-class AI art generator.FeaturedImage GenerationDesign-0.7% search trend, 3 moNo reviews yet